A good stereotype seems paradoxical
to the common person because we believe that classifying the human race crushes
people’s hopes and dreams. We think that everyone is extraordinary and unique
and it is impossible to limit someone’s abilities. According to a survey by the
National Journal, 55% of people think they are above average intelligence.
Ironically, even though we think so highly of ourselves and that we are
impossible to classify into a category, we feel that it is perfectly fine to
classify other people. Our goal as a society seems to be that we should be able
to simply glance at someone and predict everything about him or her. Yet why do
we continue to classify people when we know its wrong?
Stereotyping gives us a
sense of safety because it limits the unknown. Dictionary.com defines unknown
as “strange, unfamiliar, and not widely known”. Stereotyping gives the ability
to know everything about a person and therefore eliminates “strange,
unfamiliarity” we experience when we first encounter a person.
Brent Staple’s “first
victim”(Staples 205) felt safe and secure because she classified Staples into
the robber/rapist category and immediately knew that she should escape from
him. If Brent Staples was from some obscure race that had never been classified
into a category, the woman would have felt less secure because she didn’t know
whether she should run away or stay put. Stereotyping gives us an opportunity
to venture into the unknown without actually risking our comfort.
Excellent analysis of the reasoning for stereotypes. I am fascinated by the question you ask about our motivation for continuing something we say we know is wrong.
ReplyDelete